start of page 289
Ad Hoc Committee To Study the Peaceful Uses of the Sea-Bed and the Ocean Floor Beyond the Limits of National Jurisdiction, U.N., 146, 147
AEC (see Atomic Energy Commission).
Air Force, Department of, Aircraft meteorological instrumentation, 189
Aircraft:
Commission recommendation: Aircraft-of-opportunity program, 193American Bureau of Shipping, Vessel certification, 215
Oceanographic data collection, 192, 193
AMVER (see Automated Merchant Vessel Reporting System).
Applications Technology Satellites (ATS):
ATS-3 omega position locating equipment, 193Aquaculture:
Oceanographic research capabilities, 193
Coastal zone activity, 54Army Corps of Engineers (see also Coastal Engineering Research Center).
Commission recommendation: advancement, encouragement, support, 118
Definition, 115-117
Future possibilities, 12, 116, 118
Government support, 240
Present status in United States, 115, 116
Summary of yields, chart, 116, 117
Channel and harbor improvement financing, 65Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission, 96
Chesapeake Bay research program, 67
Coastal engineering methods, 33, 81
Coastal erosion study authorization, 65
Coastal zones:Management role, 56, 61, 62Commission recommendations:
Monitoring role, 68
Research role, 67Coastal erosion study reexamination, 65Dredging activities, 252
Offshore development, 70
Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 amendment, 76, 77
Gulf of Mexico fairways establishment, 54, 55
Lake Survey charts, 210
Navigable waterways construction regulations enforcement, 217
Pollution control, construction activities effects, 76
Port and harbor modernization role, 66
Relation to Coastal Zone Authorities, 59
Responsibilities in marine activity, 228, 232
Atomic Energy Commission (AEC):
Coastal zone monitoring role, 68ATS (see Application Technology Satellites).
Coastal zone research expansion, 81
Commission recommendations:Offshore development, 70Federal oceanography laboratories funding, 205, 206
Pilot continental shelf nuclear plant, 10, 70, 161
Pollution control authority, 77
Marine research funding, 24
NODC establishment agreement, 219
Nuclear technology for harbor evacuation studies, 252
Pollution control, nuclear power plant effects, 77
Power sources f'or marine resources development, 161, 167
Role in Federal marine program, 232, 235
Automated Merchant Vessel Reporting System (AMVER), description, 216
B
Barbados Oceanographic and Meteorological Experiment (BOMEX), 196
BCF (see Bureau of Commercial Fisheries).
Biological research:
Extracting drugs from the sea, 119, 120BOMEX (see Barbados Oceanographic and Meteorological Experiment).
Fishery yields, 98-100
Oceanic ecosystems dynamics, 172, 173
Sea plants sources, 118
Budget for marine science program, proposed:
Activities not included, 252Buoys (see also National Data Buoy System Program; Pilot Buoy Network Project).
Cost estimates, 254-257
Efficiency considerations, 251
Funding considerations, 251, 252
Levels of funding for recommended activities, 1970-80, chart, 253
Methods of costing, 251
Non-Federal expenditures exclusion, 252
Present Federal funding level estimation, 252, 253
Projected costs of program, chart, 255
Commission recommendation: technology support, 191, 192Bureau of Commercial Fisheries (BCF):
Data collection and transmission capabilities, 191
Aquaculture research, 240
Average budget increase, 252
Cooperation with Navy, ships-of-opportunity program, 188
start of page 290
Marine fisheries:Bureau of Land Management, coastal zone management role, 62Equipment development, 101NODC establishment agreement, 219
Survey program, 99
Participation in NOAA organization, 232, 234, 235
Proposed responsibilities under NOAA, 239, 240
Research expenditures, 98
Technology development, 33
Bureau of Mines, ocean mining responsibilities, 141
Bureau of Outdoor Recreation, establishment, 70
Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife:
Estuarine study, 63
Proposed responsibilities under NOA4, 239, 240
Sandy Hook Marine Laboratory program, 240
Research program, 67
Canada:
Cooperation with United States in international fisheries management, 104, 107-109Central Radio Propagation Laboratory, consolidation under ESSA, 241
Offshore coal mining, 132
Chemical research, sea plant sources, 118
Chile, continental shelf definition, 145
Clean Water Restoration Act of 1966:
Coastal zones management aid, 57Clearinghouse for Federal Scientific and Technical Information (CFSTI), availability of materials, 283
Estuaries study authorization and requirements, 63
Coast and Geodetic Survey, U.S.:
Consolidation under ESSA, 241Coast Guard, U.S.:
Continental shelves mapping program, 211
Maps and charts publication responsibility, 210
NODC establishment agreement, 219
Auxiliary assistance to States in recreational boating safety, 216Coastal Engineering Research Center, 33, 67, 228
Average budget increases, 252
Coastal zone:Management, 56Cooperation with Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife, 240
Monitoring role, 68
Cooperation with Geological Survey and Navy, mapping and charting, 210
Gulf of Mexico fairways establishment, 54, 55
Marine law enforcement authority, 217
National Data Buoy System program, 191
National navigation system responsibility, 213-214
Polar exploration responsibilities, 244
Port and harbor modernization role, 67
Present status and function, 236-238
Proposed role in NOAA, 232, 234, 235, 238, 239
Radiosonde observations, 188
Rescue services, 216
Vessel certification responsibility, 215
Coastal Management Act, Commission recommendation, 57
Coastal Zone Laboratories:
Commission recommendations:Coastal zones (see also State Coastal Zone Authorities).Establishment, 29Establishment and role, 9, 10
Institutional funding, 242, 243
Federal laboratories research coordination, 67
Funding and costs, 40, 44, 81
Objectives, 27, 29
Pollution control, 75
University affiliation, 69
Aquaculture, 54
Commission recommendations:AEC/Corps of Engineers/DOT/NOAA development feasibility studies, 70Description, 49
Federal and State agencies' role in monitoring and research, 68
Monitoring and research instrumentation development, 68
Monitoring and research program leadership, 68
NOAA participation in surveys and inventories, 63
NOAA responsibilities, 62
Offshore leasing procedures, 72
Recreation development, 71
University training assistance, 69
Development:Onshore operations, 69, 70Division of authority, 51, 52
Recreation, 70, 71
"Seasteads," 70, 71
Environmental problems, 8
Fisheries, 53, 54
Geographic scope, 51
Great Lakes restoration 10, 77-78, 81
Interim policies 10
Management:Development framework, 69
start of page 291
Columbia, marine fishery dispute, 108, 109Federal aid to States, 57Monitoring and research:
Federal role, 50, 60-62
Federal/State coordination, 61, 62
Local authority, 56
Personnel needs 68, 69
Planning needs, 62
Program costs, 79-81
Reorganization needs, 49
Responsibility, 8, 9, 56
State authority, 56, 57
State boundary determination, 62, 63Monitoring needs, 68Oceanic zones (see also Zones under international law).
Research needs, 67, 68
Significance, 67
Offshore water use, 55, 56
Oil and mineral exploitation, 55, 56
Percentage of population living in coastal countries, chart, 2
Pollution:Action programs, 76, 77Recreational activity summary, chart, 52
Characteristics, 73, 74
Control objectives, 74-76
Problem, 10, 72, 73
Relationship of internal waters, the territorial sea, the contiguous zone, and the continental shelf, chart, 51
Research needs, 27, 67
Resource activities, 54, 55
Resource surveys, 13, 139-141
Science and technology, 9, 10
"Seasteads," 70, 71
Shoreline development, 52, 53
Significance, 49
Surveys and inventories:Coastal erosion, 65Usage intensiflcation, 52
Estuarine inventory, 63, 65
Ports and harbors, 65, 66
Commerce, Department of (see also Environmental Science Services Administration; Office of the Federal Coordinator for Meteorological Services and Applied Meteorological Research).
Marine industry development assistance, 159, 160Commission on Marine Science, Engineering and Resources:
Marine research funding, 24
National Weather Records Center funding, 220
State Technical Services Program, 101
Activities of the members, 281Commission on Weather Modification, NSF, atmosphere behavior alteration by man, 171
Administrative organization, 279, 280
Assistance from private and professional groups, 282
Contract studies and reports, 283, 284
Establishment, 266, 278
Interaction with other groups and individuals, 281, 282
International Panel, membership, 280
Legislative authority, 279
Material utilized, 281
Membership, 278
Panel on Basic Science, membership, 280
Panel on Environmental Monitoring and on Management and Development of the Coastal Zone:Activity, 280Panel on Industry and Private Investment, membership, 280
Functions and programs of Federal agencies, 182
Identification of increase in coastal zone usage, 52
Membership, 280
Panel on Manpower, Education, and Training, membership, 280
Panel on Marine Engineering and Technology:Fixed Continental Shelf Laboratories, 162-164Panel on Marine Resources:
Fresh water restoration project, 78
Industrial technology in ocean resources development, 161
Membership, 280Fishermen's net economic return improvement, 94Papers submitted, 284, 285
Membership, 280
Relationship with National Council on Marine Resources and Engineering Development, 281
Reports, 283
Staff makeup, 281
Commissions:
Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission, 96
Commission on Weather Modifications, NSF, 171
Federal Power Commission, 127-130
Great Lakes Fisheries Commission, 113
Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission, 96
Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission, 169, 175, 199, 200, 205
International Joint Commission for the Great Lakes, 78
start of page 292
National Seashore Boundary Commission, 63Committee on Atmospheric Sciences, NAS, weather modification report, 198
Pacific Halibut Commission 92, 93
Pacific Marine Fisheries Commission, 96
Public Land Law Review Commission, 136
Committee on Multiple Use of the Coastal Zone:
Coastal zones management, 56Committee on Ocean Engineering, NAE, assistance to Commission on Marine Science, Engineering and Resources, 66
Port modernization study, 66
Committee on Oceanography, NAS:
Assistance to the Commission, 282Committees and boards:
Ocean maps, 209
Ocean research review, 194
"Oceanography, 1960-1970," 278
"Oceanography 1966," 279
Ad Hoc Committee To Study the Peaceful Uses of the Sea-Bed and the Ocean Floor Beyond the Limits of National Jurisdiction (U.N.), 146, 147Congress, U.S.:
Committee on Atmospheric Sciences, NAS, 198
Committee on Multiple Uses of the Coastal Zone, 56, 66
Committee on Ocean Engineering, NAE, 282
Committee on Oceanography, NAS, 194, 209, 278, 279, 282
Committee on Petroleum Resources Under the Ocean Floor, 144-146
Disarmament Committee, U.N., 3, 4
Interagency Committee on Ocean Exploration and Environmental Services, 182, 183
Interagency Committee on Oceanography, 17, 278
Interdepartmental Committee for Atmospheric Sciences, 183
National Advisory Committee for the Oceans (NACO), 19, 39, 40, 165, 245-247
Ocean Science and Technology Committee, NSIA, 282
President's Science Advisory Committee, 157, 169, 194, 210, 278, 279
Public Land Law Review Commission, 136
Bill H.R. 12601, Presidential veto, 279Conservation (see also Land and Water Conservation Fund):
Commission recommendation: pollution control status reports from Interior Dept., 76
Committee jurisdiction over executive agencies in marine science, chart, 248
Oversight of marine activities, 247-249
Coastal zone recreation areas, 60Conshelf project, French, 162
Fisheries, 12, 90-95
Great Lakes restoration, 10, 77-78
International fisheries management, 104
Marine resources, 10
Natural preserves for study, 10
Continental Shelf (see also Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act of 1953):
Approximate delineation of continental shelves and intermediate zones as proposed, maps, 152, 153, 154Continental Shelf Laboratories Project:
Commission recommendations:Amendment of Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, 156, 157Existing definition, 143
Guaranteeing private investment, 156
Leasing beyond the 200-meter isobath, 156
New deflnidon, 145, 146
Fixed continental shelf laboratories, 162-164
International Registry Authority:Creation of an intermediate zone, 151-154Line profiles of different points off the U.S. coast, chart, 124
Dispute settlement, 150, 151
Policies on all industry registered claims, 154, 155
Policing functions, 150
Powers and duties of registering nations, 150
Proposed claims registration procedure, 147-149
Proposed funding procedure, 149, 150
Proposed interim action, 155-157
Mapping, 210, 211
Portable continental shelf laboratories, 164
Subsea areas beyond the shelf and recommended legal-political arrangements, 146, 147
Truman Proclamation of 1945, 145
Uncertainties and recommended redefinition, 143-145
U.S./industry cooperation on registry claims, 154, 155
Capabilities and functions, 162-164Convention on the Continental Shelf:
Estimated cost, 167
Objectives, 10, 11
Test facilities for undersea navigation technology, 214
Definition, 143
"Median line" principle, 151
National sovereignty, 50, 51, 143
start of page 293
Research restrictions, 202, 203Convention on Fishing and Conservation of the Living Resources of the High Seas:
Scientific Investigation requirements, 205
Adoption, 109Convention on the Territorial Sea and the Contiguous Zone:
Need for international compliance, 112-114
National sovereignty, 49, 50
Submersible requirements in territorial waters, 203
Territorial sea clarification, 111, 204
Data acquisition, processing, and dissemination:
Commission recommendations:Deep Exploration Submersible Systems Project:Coordinated system of data centers, 221Data services available, 218, 219
Cost estimate, 224
Data centers' restrictions, 220
Workings of the data system, chart, 219
Capabilities and function, 180Deep ocean exploration:
Cost estimate, 206
Commission recommendations:Deep Sea Stations Project, Commission recommendation, 178Manner and unmanned probing, 176International cooperation, 174, 175
National needs considerations, 175
Navy/NOAA deep ocean stations, 178
Landmarks in the development of ocean technology, chart, 6
Technological requirements, 16, 17, 176, 177
Defense, Department of (DOD) (see also Air Force; Army Corps of Engineers; Military Sea Transport Services; Navy; Office of the Special Assistant for Environmental Services of the Joint Chiefs of Staff).
Marine-related military programs, 252Department of the Air Force (see Air Force, Department of).
Marine resources development, technology transfer, 165
Marine science research, 5, 30
NEMPS data processing and forecasts issuance, 185
Polar exploration responsibilities, 244
Specialized marine environmental monitoring needs, 184
Department of Commerce (see Commerce, Department of).
Department of Defense (see Defense, Department of)
Department of Health, Education, and Welfare (see Health, Education, and Welfare, Department of).
Department of Housing and Urban Development (see Housing and Urban Development, Department of).
Department of the Interior (see Interior, Department of).
Department of the Navy (see Navy, Department of).
Department of State (see State, Department of).
Department of Transportation (see Transportation, Department of).
Desalination programs, 137-139
Disarmament Committee, U.N., ocean floor arms limitation, 3, 4
E
Economic Development Administration:
Marine resources capital investment, 159, 160Ecuador:
Port and harbor modernization role, 66
Continental shelf definition, 145Education:
Marine fishery dispute, 108, 109
Commission recommendations:Elliott and Naftalin, "Federal Authority for Conduet of Marine Activities," 283Expansion of support, 43Funding sources for principal marine science institutions, map, 31
NOAA responsibility for statistics and coordination, 43, 44
Postdoctoral and midcareer orientation, 43, 44
Graduates and enrollees in marine science programs, chart, 42
National Sea Grant Program support, 43, 44
NSF support, 43
Principal marine science laboratories and institutions, map, 28
Environmental Data Service, ESSA, 219
Environmental research (see also Marine ecology).
Commission recommendations:Balanced effort in research, exploration, and technology, 170Damage by man, 1
Environmental modification study, 198
National monitoring program, 171
Table, 274, 275
Deep sea exploration, 16-17, 174-178
Environmental modification. 17, 197-198
start of page 294
Global environmental programs:Environmental Science Services Administration (ESSA) (see also Coast and Geodetic Survey; Environmental Data Services; ESSA meteorological satellites, SEAMAP; Weather Bureau).Cost estimates, chart, 207Military/civilian roles, 16, 183-185
Fundamental technology programs, 206
Global monitoring systems, 206
Research and exploration programs, 205, 206
Monitoring and prediction system, 15, 16, 206, 207
Oceanographic effects, 2, 3, 169-171
Aircraft meteorology instrumentation, 189ESSA (see Environmental Science Services Administration).
Average budget increases, 252
Coastal zone monitoring role, 68
Cooperation with Coast Guard, Geological Survey, and Navy in mapping and charting, 210
Cooperation with NASA in weather satellite program, 187
Establishment and purpose, 182
Mapping and charting responsibilities, 209-212
Participation in NOAA organization, 232, 234, 235
Planned geophysical survey, 139, 140
Polar exploration responsibilities, 244
Present responsibilities, 241
Proposed responsibilities under NOAA, 241
Radiosonde observations, 188
Weather and marine information system, 184
Weather modification responsibilities, 198
Weather service program, 252
ESSA meteorological satellites, oceanographic capabilities, 193
Executive Office of the President:
Establishment of NOAA, 246, 247Executive Order 11288, 77
Legislative requirements, reports on marine science accomplishments, 265, 266
F
FDA (see Food and Drug Administration).
Federal Council for Science and Technology (see also Interagency Committee on Oceanography; Interdepartmental Committee for Atmospheric Sciences).
Federal Laboratories:
Commission recommendation: strengthening, 29Federal Power Commission (FPC), natural gas regulatory powers, 127-130
Consolidation of civil agencies in-house labs, 29
Financial support, 44
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration (FWPCA):
Coastal zone:Fish and Wildlife Service (see Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife).Management role, 62, 252Commission recommendations:
Research, 67Pollutant and pollution loads research, 76Costs, 81
Role in Great Lakes restoration, 78
Estuary survey, 63
Research and development program, 77
River inflow monitoring, 68
Statutory requirement, 29
Fish Protein Concentrate Program
Commission recommendation: expanded support, 103Fisheries (see also Bureau of Commercial Fisheries: Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife):
Technology development, 102-104
Commission recommendations:Excess fishing curtailment, 93Domestic fisheries management and rehabilitation:
Extension services establishment, 101
Fishery analysis and exploitation, 98
Fishing technology program, 101
International agreement on catch limit for cod and haddock fisheries of North Atlantic, 105, 106
International fishery commission financing, 114
International provisions, enforcement and regulations, 114
Management aims, 92
National catch quotas for high seas fisheries of North Pacific, 108
National priorities, policies, and regulation, 96, 97
Preferential treatment of coastal nations, 110, 111
Rationalize U.S. fishing effort in North Atlantic, 108
Removal of restriction of foreign built vessels and equipment, 98
Settlement of disputes and problems arbitration, 114, 115
Stock assessment, surveys, and exploratory fishing, 100, 101
Stock improvement research programs, 89
Strengthening international fishery organizations, 111-113
Territorial seas agreement, 111
start of page 295
Fisherman's Protective Act of 1954, 109, 110Federal and State roles, 95, 96Estuarine habitat areas lost to filling operation, chart, 54
Fishing industry decline, 94, 95
Estuarine habitats, 53, 54
Extension services, 101-104
Food potential, 88, 89
Increasing gap between world food needs and food supply, chart, 87
International cooperation, 93
International fisheries management:Administrative organization, 113, 114Management:
Commission evaluation, 105
Dispute settlement procedure, 114, 115
Existing framework, 104, 105
National catch quotas, 105-109
Objectives, 104
Regulation enforcement, 114
Total expenditures and U.S. funding, 113Need for regulating fisheries, 11, 12, 90-92Proposed rehabilitation by NOAA, 239, 240
Objectives, 93, 94
Research, technology, and survey programs, 12, 98-101
Trends in the U.S. and world catch of fish, chart, 89
U.S. economic improvement, 11
Vessel subsidy programs, 97, 98
World production and demand, 89, 90
Fleet Numerical Weather Central, Monterey, Calif., 184
FLIP surface platform, 177
Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), 90, 111, 199
Food and Drug Administration (FDA):
Fish protein concentrate program, 102FPC (see Federal Power Commission).
Marine law enforcement functions, 217
France (see also Conshelf project), satellite interrogation of free floating platforms, 193
FWPCA (see Federal Water Pollution Control Administration).
G
Geneva Conventions on the Law of the Sea (see Convention on the Continental Shelf; Convention on the Territorial Sea and Contiguous Zone; Convention on Fishing and Conservation of the Living Resources of the High Seas).
Geological mapping and analysis programs:
Commission recommendation: reconnaissance surveys and analysis, 140Geological Survey, U.S.:
Coordination of programs need, 140, 141
Cost estimate, 167
Pre-investment surveys need, 139-141
Capabilities and responsibilities, 141, 228George Washington University, program of policy studies in science and technology reports, 283, 284
Cooperation with Coast Guard, ESSA, and Navy in mapping and charting, 17
River inflow monitoring, 68
Great Britain, Offshore coal mining, 132
Great Lakes Fisheries Commission, funding, 113
Great Lakes Restoration Feasibility Test Project:
Commission recommendation: establishment and FWPCA responsibility, 78Gulf of Mexico:
Funding requirements, 81
Fairways establishment, 54, 55Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission, 96
JOIDES deep sea drilling project, 123
Offshore platforms, environmental observation instruments, 188
H
Health, Education, and Welfare, Department of (HEW) (see also Food and Drug Administration; Institute of Marine Medicine and Pharmacology; Public Health Service), marine drugs screening, 12, 119
HEW (see Health, Education, and Welfare, Department of).
Homestead Act of 1862, influence on seastead concept, 72
Honduras, marine fishery dispute, 108, 109
Housing Act of 1954, 57
Housing and Urban Development, Department of (HUD), role in coastal zones management, 56
HUD (see Housing and Urban Development, Department of).
Hurricane Warning Service, Commission recommendation: data networks expansion, 190
I
Icebergs:
Commission recommendation: forecasting and remote sensing of sea ice, 190ICNAF (see International Convention for the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries).
Motion and deformation of sea ice prediction capability, 190
ICSU (see International Council of Scientific Unions).
start of page 296
IGOSS (see Integrated Global Ocean Station System).
Capital investment and requirements, 159, 160INPEC (see International Convention on the High Seas Fisheries of the North Pacific).
Federal and State regulations and support, 13, 14
Fishing vessels' exemption from Coast Guard certification regulation, 215
Fresh water resources, 137-139
Fundamental technology support, 5, 6, 35-37, 134, 161
Geological and geophysical surveys, 13, 139-141
Government/industry relationship in developing marine resources, 13, 14, 83, 157-166
Mapping and charting role, 210
Marine fisheries development, 10, 89-101, 239, 240
Merchant ship instrumentation for environmental observations, 188
Minerals development, 13, 130-137
Natural gas development, 127-130
Oceanographic research effects, 170
Oil, gas, and mineral exploitation, 10, 13, 54, 55
Petroleum development, 122-127
Transfer of technology, 164, 165
United States/industry cooperation on continental shelf claims, 154, 155
Instrument testing and calibration, 221-223
Institute of Marine Medicine and Pharmacology, HEW, Commission recommendation, 12, 120, 121
Integrated Global Ocean Station System (IGOSS):
Description, 200Interagency Committee on Ocean Exploration and Environmental Services:
U.S. participation, 16
Coordination of Federal environmental monitoring programs, 182Interagency Committee on Oceanography, 17, 278
Responsibilities, 183
Interagency cooperation:
AEC/Army Corps of Engineers/DOT/NOAA in offshore development feasibility study, recommendation, 70Interdepartmental Committee for Atmospheric Sciences, 183
Army Corps of Engineers/Fish and Wildlife Service/FWPCA/NOAA in coastal zone research, 10, 67
Army Corps of Engineers/Interior Dept./State Coastal Zone Authority/NOAA in coastal zone management, 61
Bureau of Commercial Fisheries/Navy/ESSA in ships-of-opportunity program, 188
Coast Guard/Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife in fish species charting, 240
ESSA/NASA in national weather satellite program, 187
ESSA/NASA/DOD in environmental monitoring and prediction, 241
FWPCA/Geological Survey in river inflow monitoring, 68
Mapping and charting, 210
Marine technology, Navy and others, 7, 38-40, 235
Meteorological coordination, 244, 245
NASA/Navy in spacecraft oceanography, 187
Navy/Coast Quard in military preparedness, 238
NODC establishment and funding, 219, 220
Polar exploration, 243, 244
Port and waterway study, recommendation, 66
Intergovernmental Cooperation Act of 1968, 101, 102
Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission (IOC) (see also Integrated Ocean Station System).
Capabilities, 199, 200Interior, Department of (see also Bureau of Commercial Fisheries; Bureau of Land Management; Bureau of Mines; Bureau of Outdoor Recreation; Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife; Federal Water Pollution Control Administration; Fish and Wildlife Service; Geological Survey; National Park Service).
Deep ocean exploration coordination and planning, 175
Establishment and activities, 199
IGOSS planning, 200
Scientific investigation certification, 205
Tsunami Warning System coordinating responsibility, 200
U.S. participation, 169
Coastal zones management, 56, 61, 62International Agreement for Regulation of Whaling, 104
Commission recommendations:Estuarine studies, 65Federal regulations enforcement authority, 127
Fresh water desalination program, 137-139
Pollution control status report to Congress, 76
Marine geological survey program, 139, 140
Marine research funding, 23
Ocean mining:Funding, 141Pollution control, State regulatory standards, 75
Guidelines, 136
Responsibility in marine activities, 228, 239, 240
Role in marine minerals development, 141
Water pollution from boats, estimates, 74
start of page 297
International Biological Program, 175
International Convention for the Conservation of Atlantic Tuna, 104
International Convention for the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries (ICNAF):
Commission recommendations:International Convention on Inter-American Tropical Tuna, 104National catch quotas, 105, 107-109
National catch quotas establishment, 105, 106
U.S. participation, 104
Working Group on Joint Biological and Economic Assessment of Conservation Actions, 109
International Convention on the Conservation and Protection of North Pacific Fur Seals, 104
International Convention on the Great Lakes Fisheries, 104
International Convention on the High Seas, 50
International Convention on the High Seas Fisheries of the North Pacific (INPFC):
National catch quotas, 108, 109International Convention on the Preservation of the Halibut Fishery of the Northern Pacific Ocean and Bering Sea, 104
U.S. participation, 104
International Convention on the Protection, Preservation, and Extension of the Salmon Fishery of the Fraser River System, 104
International cooperation (see also Intergovernmental Cooperation Act of 1968; Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission; United Nations; World Meteorological Organization).
Agreement for Regulation of Whaling, 104International Council of Scientific Unions (ICSU):
Canada/United States, fisheries management, 104, 107-109
Columbia/United States, marine fishery dispute, 108, 109
Commission recommendations:Intergovernmental organization on oceanography, 200, 201Communications improvement, 189
National catch quotas, 105-107
Principle of maximum freedom for scientific inquiry, 202
U.S. action to encourage freedom of scientific research, 204, 205
Continental shelf:Creation of an intermediate zone, 151-154Deep ocean exploration, 174, 175
Dispute settlement, 150, 151
Policing functions for the registry authority, 150
Powers and duties of registering nations, 150
Proposed claims registration procedure, 147-149
Proposed funding for International Registry Authority, 149, 130
Difficulties arising from Truman Proclamation of 1945, 145
Ecuador/United States, marine fishery dispute. 108, 109
Environmental monitoring and prediction, 16
Fish protein concentrate program, 102
Global environmental monitoring system, 198-201
Honduras/United States, marine fishery dispute, 108, 109
International fisheries management, 15, 93, 104, 105
International Registry Authority, 155-157
Japan/United States in fisheries management, 104, 107-109
Mexico/United States in fisheries management, 104, 108-109
NOAA participation in international programs, 235
Ocean mining legal-political framework, 141-143
Panama/United States marine fishery dispute, 108, 109
Peru/United States marine fishery dispute, 108, 109
Preferential treatment of the coastal nation, 108-111
Research restrictions under existing legal framework, 201-203
U.N. arms limitations, 3, 4
U.N. role in international fisheries management, 90, 104
United States/foreign industry cooperation on registry claims, 154, 155
U.S.S.R./United States in fisheries management, 104, 107
World Weather Program, 3, 16, 200
Constituent groups related to marine sciences, 199International Decade of Ocean Exploration:
Ocean exploration advice, 175
Commission recommendation, 175International Hydrographic Bureau:
Proposed NOAA participation, 242, 243
Submersibles contribution, 180
U.S. expenditures, 206
U.S. proposal, 3, 174, 175
Ocean survey data standardization and dissemination, 199International Joint Commission for the Great Lakes. 78
U.S. commitments, 175
start of page 298
Interrogation, Recording, and Location System (IRLS) 193
IOC (see Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission).
IRLS (see Interrogation, Recording, and Location System).
J
Japan:
Cooperation with U.S. in fisheries management, 104, 107-109JOIDES deep sea drilling project, 123, 172
Offshore coal mining 132
L
Lakes Survey, United States:
Participation in NOAA organization, 232, 235Lamont Geological Observatory:
Present responsibilities, 241
Proposed responsibilities, 241, 242
South Atlantic sediment studies, 173Land and Water Conservation Fund:
Status, 25
Commission recommendation: utilization for wetland acquisition, 60Large Stable Ocean Platform Project, 38
Land acquisition funds, 80, 81
Latin America marine fishery disputes, 109-111, 144
M
Manned ocean habitats:
Commission recommendation: advanced deep ocean stations, 178Mapping and charting:
Cost estimates 206
Future capabilities, 177, 178
Agency responsibilities and industry role, 209, 210Marine activities:
Bathymetric and geophysical characteristics of the continental shelf, 210, 211
Commission recommendations:General ocean mapping program, 210Cost estimates, 224
Mapping of bathymetry and geophysics of U.S. waters and continental shelves, 211
Nautical charting activities acceleration, 212
Survey equipment development, 213
Nautical charting surveys, 211, 212
Survey technology needs, 212, 213
Terminology, 209
Commission recommendation: Federal organization, 227-230Marine Council (see National Council on Marine Resources and Engineering Development).
Congressional oversight, 247, 249
Federal agencies currently associated with marine science, chart, 228
National program need, 1, 4, 17
National significance, 19
Need for reorganization, 17-19, 247, 249
Overseeing the national program, 244, 245
Proposed operational planning and coordination of a Federal program, 244, 245
Aquaculture contributions, 115Marine environmental monitoring and prediction services (see also National Environmental Monitoring and Prediction System).
Beneficial and detrimental modifications, 198
Commission recommendation: prediction capabilities development, 197
Definition, 266
Poisonous marine organisms, 120
Prediction capabilities, 197
Federal funding categories, 183Marine geology:
Limiting factors, 181, 182
Products of the present system, 183, 184
Systems operations, 182, 183
Areas of concentration, 141Marine instruments:
Earth's crust research and ocean resources survey, 172
Need for geological survey programs, 139-141
Profile of the continents and oceans, 140
Theory of the continental drift, map, 172
Commission recommendation: calibration and testing program, 223Marine resources (see also Aquaculture; Fisheries; Fresh water resources; Industry; Natural gas; Ocean mining; Petroleum).
Testing and calibration standards, 221, 223
Commission recommendations:Defining areas beyond continental shelf, 147Dockside value of resources, 158
Government role in support of resource development, 157
Industrial capital sources and requirements, 159, 160
Industry role in support of resource development, 157, 158
Legal and regulatory framework for safeguarding industrial investment, 160
Offshore oil leasing and regulation, 124-127
Program costs, 166, 167
Domestic marine resource-based industry, present status, chart, 159
Drugs, 12, 119-121
start of page 299
Fresh water resources and desalination, 137-139Marine Resources and Engineering Development Act of 1966:
Hard mineral resources:Current state of ocean mining, 132, 133Industrial activities and needs, 13, 158, 159
Delegation of Government responsibility, 141
Exploration and development guidelines, 136
International legal-political framework, 141-157
Legal and regulatory considerations, 135-137
Necessity for development, 130
Present world resource status, 130-132
Technological considerations and obstacles, 133-135
National resource policy, 10, 83-86
Need for government/industry cooperation, 85, 186
Need for international cooperation, 85
Power source technology for resource development, 161, 162
Proposed 10-year cost breakdown, chart, 166
Research, technology, and survey programs, 12
Resource activities in coastal zone, 54, 55
Resource surveys, 13, 139-141
Sea plants, research and uses, 11, 118
Technology services to support industry activities, Government responsibility, 161
Annual report requirement, 247Marine science and technology:
Content summary, 279
Executive responsibility, 247
International cooperation, 3
Text, 261-266
Commission recommendations:Marine Technology Society, 282Fundamental technology, 36, 37Costs, 44-47
National ocean program objectives, 23, 32
National projects, 37
Navy/NOAA liaison on fundamental technology, 40
Scientific and technical information and extension program, 44
Definition, 266
Federal agencies currently associated with marine science, chart, 228
Federal agencies' laboratories, 29
Fundamental technology:Comparison with applied technology, 35, 36Government role, 21, 22, 33, 157
Government/industry/university cooperation, 36, 38-40
Instrumentation need, 36
Support needs, 36
Industry role, 33, 158, 161
Information dissemination, 44, 164, 165
International apparatus, 199
Materials and instrumentation needs, 5, 7, 35, 36, 221-223
National capability, 21, 33
National projects, 7, 37, 38
Navy role, 7, 8, 40
Objectives, 5, 23, 31, 32, 37
Research facilities, 4, 5, 25, 26
Research support diversity, 30
Significance, 3, 4, 22, 23, 30, 31
Marine transportation:
Commission recommendation: study of port and waterway systems, 66Maritime Administration, port and harbor modernization role, 66
Growth and change, 65
Ports and harbors:Fact-finding study, 66Traffic congestion and control, 66, 215
Waterway deepening, 65, 66
Medical research:
Drugs developed from the sea, estimated cost, 167Meteorology:
Extracting drugs from the sea, 12, 119, 120
Hurricane development forecasting, 189, 190Mexico:
Research programs coordination, 182, 183
Cooperation with United States, 104Military Sea Transport Service, radiosonde observations, 188
Marine fishery dispute, 108, 109
Mobile Undersea Support Laboratory Project, 178
N
NACO (see National Advisory Committee for the Oceans).
NAE (see National Academy of Engineering).
NAS (see National Academy of Sciences).
NASA (see National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
National Academy of Engineers (NAE) (see also Committee on Ocean Engineering).
National Academy of Sciences (NAS) (see also Committee on Atmospheric Sciences; Committee on Oceanography).
Atmospheric behavior alteration by man, 171
Deep ocean exploration, 175
Mapping and survey programs importance, 210
Statement on marine science needs and accomplishments, 284
start of page 300
National Advisory Committee for the Oceans (NACO)
Commission recommendations:National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA):Administrative make-up, 245, 246Government/industry/university participation, 39, 40
Establishment and functions, 19, 245, 246
Technology transfer role, 165
Commission recommendation: cooperation with NOAA on satellite oceanography, 187, 188National Bureau of Standards, reference standards and test procedures for marine instruments, 222
Cooperation with ESSA in national weather satellite program, 187
Cooperation with Navy in spacecraft oceanography, 187
Earth resources program, sensor development, 187
Marine program funding problems comparison, 251
Marine research funding, 24
Participation in NOAA organization, 232, 235
Satellites, oceanographic applications, 210
Spacecraft use in environmental monitoring, 187
National Association of State Boating Law Administrators, 217
National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR), transfer of funding responsibility to NOAA, 243
National Council on Marine Resources and Engineering Development (see also Committee on Multiple Use of the Coastal Zone; Interagency Committee on Ocean Exploration and Environmental Services)
Commission recommendations: continuance, 18, 247National Data Buoy System Program, 191
Coordination of Federal coastal activities, 56, 245
Establishment, 247, 262
International cooperation authority, 265
Marine activities planning and coordination 229
Marine data needs study, 232
National Data Buoy System Program initiation, 166
Present Federal funding level estimation, 253
Relationship with the Commission, 281
Responsibilities, 17, 247, 262, 263
National economy and marine program, effect, 170, 171
National Environmental Monitoring and Prediction System (NEMPS) (see also Marine environmental monitoring and prediction services)
Commission recommendations:National Institutes of Health (NIH), 120, 121Development on a global basis, 201Cost estimate, 207
Establishment and activities, 16, 184, 185, 231
Organization and management, 185, 186
Systems analysis, 194
Data collection devices, 191-194
Formation, 241
Immediate improvements possibility, 188-190
Initial data requirements for forecasts of given lengths, chart, 192
System operations, 184
Systems analysis, 194
National Multi-Agency Oil and Hazardous Materials Contingency Plan of September 1968, 75
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Agency (NOAA):
Capabilities, 234-236National Oceanographic Data Center (NODC):
Commission recommendations:Establishment, 230Considerations dealing with proposed agency transfers, 236-244
Independent status, 233
Responsibilities, 245
Objectives and responsibilities, 4, 18, 246, 247
Operational planning and coordination of Federal marine activities, 244, 245
Organization and function, 230-234
Proposed budget, 258
Proposed make-up, chart, 233
Commission recommendations:National Park Service, shoreline management, 70Administration and financing, 220Functions, funding, and organization, 219, 220
Federal support, 221
Functions, 220
Oceanographic data indexes establishment, 219
Participation in NOAA organization, 232, 235
National Petroleum Council, Committee on Petroleum Resources Under the Ocean Floor:
Continental shelf redefinition, 144, 146National Projects (see also Continental Shelf Laboratories Project; Deep Exploration Submersible Systems Project; Deep Sea Stations Project; Great Lakes Restoration Feasibility Project; Large Stable Ocean Platform Project; Mobile Undersea Support Laboratory Project; Pilot Continental Shelf Nuclear Plant Project: Seamount Station Project; Test Facilities and Ocean Ranges Project)
Evaluation of continental shelf redefinition, 144-146
start of page 301
Commission recommendations:National Science Foundation (NSF) (see also Commission on Weather Modification; JOIDES deep sea drilling project; National Center for Atmospheric Research).Establishment, 37Costs, 47
Government/industry cooperation, 39
Definition and objectives, 37
Feasibility studies, 37, 38
List, 38
Management and support, 37
Coastal zone research expansion, 81National Sea Grant College and Program Act of 1966, proposed amendment, 29
Commission recommendation: expansion of university support, 43
Cooperation with Navy, 210
Growth slowdown, 25
Marine research:Funding, 23, 30, 205, 206NCAR operation, 243
Program, 24
Support activities 227, 228
NODC establishment agreement, 219
Ocean crust structure and origin research program, 172
Polar exploration responsibilities, 243
Trends in funding, chart, 25
University-National Laboratory support, 5, 242
Weather modification research:Elimination of responsibility, 198
Report, 198
National Sea Grant Program:
Aquaculture research, 240National Seashore Boundary Commission, Commission recommendation, 63
Educational support, 43, 44
Marine science support, 25
Multidisciplinary cooperation stimulation, 40
Participation in NOAA organization, 232, 235, 242
Public uses of the sea, 17
Research laboratory financial support, 81
Technical services, 101
National security:
Oceanographic requirements, 170National Security Industrial Association, Ocean Science and Technology Committee:
Undersea operations, 3, 4
Cooperation with Commission, 282National Sediment Coring Program, 139, 140
Report submitted, 284
National Weather Records Center:
Commission recommendation, 221National Weather Satellite Program, 187
Marine functions, 220
National Weather Service, recommended integration into NEMPS, 16
Current status, 127Natural resources:
FPC planning policy recommendation, 129, 130
National reserve-to-production ratio, 127, 128
New pipeline construction, 128
Research and technology accounting regulations, 128, 129
Wellhead price regulation, 128
Need to develop new sources, 84Naval Oceanographic Instrument Center:
Projected demand for given minerals to 1985 and 2000, chart, 85
Functions, 223Navigation:
Nautical charts publication, 210
Commission recommendations:Navy, Department of (see also FLIP surface platform; Office of Naval Research; Project Rocksite; Sealab project; TRANSIT navigation satellites).Cost estimate, 224Current capabilities, 213
Development work, 214, 215
National navigation system, 214
Positioning system needs, 213, 214
Submersibles, 214
Aircraft:Meteorology instrumentation, 189Civilian technology contributions, 40
Remote oceanographic sensors, 187
Coastal waters use, military operations, 55
Commission recommendation: cooperation with NOAA, 7, 163, 178
Cooperation with Bureau of Commercial Fisheries in ships-of-opportunity program, 188
Cooperation with Coast Guard, ESSA, and Geological Survey in mapping and charting, 210
Cooperation with NASA in spacecraft oceanography, 187
Cooperation with NSF in university ships support, 210
Environmental prediction services coordination. 182
Federal oceanography laboratories funding, 205, 206
start of page 302
Manned submersibles development, depth capabilities, 180NCAR (see National Center for Atmospheric Research).
Mapping and charting responsibilities, 209, 210
Marine research, 5, 7, 8, 23, 24, 33, 227
Military sea areas, policing, 217
Navigational systems development, 213, 214
NODC establishment, agreement and operation, 219
Ocean crust structure and origin research program, 172
Ocean thermal structure analysis and prediction program, 188
Polar exploration responsibilities, 243, 244
Radiosonde observations, 188
Relationship with the Coast Guard, 238
Relationship with NOAA, 232, 235
Satellites, oceanographic applications, 210
"Ten Years in Oceanography," 278
Undersea defense operations, 3
NEAFC (see Northeast Atlantic Fisheries Convention).
NEMPS (see National Environmental Monitoring and Prediction System).
Newfoundland, offshore iron mining, 132
NIH (see National Institutes of Health).
NIMBUS meteorological satellite:
IRLS flight tests, 193NOAA (see National Oceanic and Atmospheric Agency).
Oceanographic research capabilities, 193
NODC (see National Oceanographic Data Center).
Northeast Atlantic Fisheries Convention (NEAFC), 105, 106
NSF (see National Science Foundation).
Nuclear arms race, restriction from oceans, 3, 4
O
Basic dredge types, chart, 134Ocean Science and Technology Committee, assistance to the Commission, 282
Continental shelf dispute, 143-146
Current state, 132, 133
Delegation of Government responsibilities, 141
Federal support recommendation, 132, 133
International legal-political framework, 141-l57
Legal and regulatory considerations, 135-137
Oceanic Foundation, assistance to the Commission, 282
Office of the Federal Coordinator for Meteorological Services and Applied Meteorological Research:
Coordination of Federal meteorological programs, 182, 183Office of Naval Research (ONR):
Federal plan for marine meteorological services, 190
Acoustics research program, 30Office of Oceanography, UNESCO, 199
Basic marine science research, 29, 30
Commission recommendation: oceanographic program expansion, 30
Growth slowdown, 25
Marine research funding continuance, 30
Trends in funding chart, 25
University-National Laboratories establishment effect, 242
Office of the Special Assistant for Environmental Services of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, DOD, 182
Omega Position Locating Equipment (OPLE), 193
ONR (see Office of Naval Research).
OPLE (see Omega Position Locating Equipment).
Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act of 1953:
Commission recommendations:Flexibility to waive competitive bidding, 137Competitive leasing system, 124, 136
Amendment requiring Federal permission for mining, 156, 157
Industrial criticism, 135
Pacific Halibut Commission, 92, 93
Pacific Marine Fisheries Commission, 96
Panama, marine fishery dispute, 108, 109
Personnel:
Commission recommendations:Peru:NOAA authority, 43Definition and status, 43
NSF university support expansion, 43
University training support to coastal zone personnel, 69
Sources, 44
Training support, 44, 68, 69
Continental shelf definition, 145Petroleum:
Marine fishery dispute, 108, 109
Commission recommendation: development rates, 127
Development of marine resources:Current status, 122, 123
Domestic offshore expenditures, table, 123
start of page 303
Physical oceanography:Industry contributions to technology transfer, 164Domestic industry investment, 159
Legal and regulatory considerations, 124, 126, 127
Technology advances and benefits, 123, 124
Information exchange, 124
Number of successful new offshore wells by year, chart, 122
Record water depths for producing and exploratory wells, chart, 122
Basic research, 194Pilot Buoy Network Project:
Commission recommendations:Ocean current systems study, 195Research areas, 173, 194-197
Oceanic scales of motion study, 197
Sea-air interaction processes study, 196
Sea-air interaction, 195, 196
Wave analysis diagrams, 195
Commission recommendation, 192Pilot Continental Shelf Nuclear Power Plant Project:
Cost estimate, 207
Need, 16, 191
Capabilities and functions, 70, 161Pilot Harbor Redevelopment Project, 66
Estimated cost, 167
Objectives, 11
Polar exploration, 173, 174, 243, 244
Pollution (see also Federal Water Pollution Control Administration; Great Lakes Restoration Feasibility Test Project; Water Quality Act of 1965).
Action programs:Population explosion:AEC authority, 77Characteristics, 73, 74
Army Corps of Engineers authority, 76
Legislation and financing, 76
Coastal research, 10
Commission recommendations:AEC consideration of environmental effects of projects, 77Control objectives:
Enforcement review and funding, 77
FWPCA detection and analysis of pollutants, 76
National Commission establishment, 79
Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899, amendment, 76, 77
Status reports to Congress on State pollution abatement programs, 76International regulations, 75Federal legislation compliance, 10
Quality acceptability level determination, 75
Recognition, 74, 75
State quality standards, 75
Funding requirements, 81
Hazards to marine resources, 2
Problem analysis, 72, 73
Technology status, 77
Waste management, 78
Economic expansion, 1Port of New York Authority, 57
Food supply impact, 1, 84, 90
Increasing gap between world food needs and food supply, chart, 87
Recreational needs, 1, 2
Power Squadron, U.S, recreational boating educational programs, 216, 217
President's Science Advisory Committee (PSAC):
Mapping and survey programs importance, 210Project Rocksite, Navy, 177
Ocean research review, 194
Panel on Oceanography:Ecology considerations, 169
"Effective Use of the Sea", 278, 279
Government role in support of marine resource development, 157
PSAC (see President's Science Advisory Committee).
Coastal zone monitoring role, 68Public Land Law Review Commission, 136
Marine law enforcement functions, 217
Shellfish sanitation program, 252
Public Law 89-454 (see Marine Resources and Engineering Development Act of 1966).
Public Works and Economic Development Act, regional commissions, 56
Publications (see Appendix 4 for list of materials published by the Commission).
Puget Sound salmon fishery conservation program, 92
R
Recreation
Boating:Certification authority, 215Commission recommendations:
Safety program, 216, 217Public provisions in marine plans, 71Growth, status, and government support, 70
Safety regulations for boats, 217
Marine parks in the United States, map, 71
Urban waterfronts, 70, 71
start of page 304
Regulatory procedures:
Commission recommendations:Resources for the Future, Inc.:Enforcement functions cost estimate, 224Federal and State enforcement activities, 217, 218
Marine law enforcement, 218
Updating safety standards, 215, 216
Vessel certification standards, 215
Oceanographic seminars sponsorship, 282Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899, recommended amendment, 76, 77
"Selecting Policies for the Development of Marine Resources," 284
S
Safety:
Accident rate, 1967, 215Sandy Hook Marine Laboratory, 240
Commission recommendations:Cost estimates, 224Recreational boating, 216, 217
Diving equipment certification, 217
Recreational boating regulation, 217
Updating safety standards 215, 216
Search and rescue services, 216
Traffic control system, 215
Underwater safety:Emergency equipment, 217Vessel certification, 215
Equipment certification, 217
Satellite oceanography:
Capabilities, 193, 194Satellites (see Application Technology Satellites; ESSA meteorological satellites; NIMBUS meteorological satellites; Tiros meteorological satellites; TRANSIT navigation satellites).
Commission recommendations:NASA/NOAA cooperation, 187, 188Mapping and charting, 210
Sensors development, 194
NASA/Navy cooperation, 187
SBA (see Small Business Administration).
Scripps Institution of Oceanography, 25
Sealab project, Navy, 162
SEAMAP, 172
Seamount Station Project, 178
Ship-of-opportunity program:
Commission recommendation, 188, 189Small Business Administration (SBA) industry aid, 159, 160
Navy/Bureau of Commercial Fisheries cooperation, 188
World coverage, map, 189
Smithsonian Institution:
Coastal zone research expansion, 81Southern California University, assistance to the Commission, 282
Oceanographic Sorting Center:Biological and geological samples storage, 221
Commission recommendation, 221
Functions and funding, 220
Legislative requirements, 220, 221
Responsibility in marine activities, 228
State Coastal Zone Authorities:
Commission recommendations:State, Department of:Administration of Federal grants, 62Coordination with Federal agencies, 61, 62
Establishment, 8, 57
Federal grants coordination, 62
Federal legislation aid, 59
Federal financial support, 79
Functions and powers, 57-60
Interstate estuaries management, 60
Pollution control, 75
State response to proposal, 60
Marine fishery disputes, 109State Technical Services Program, 101
Relation to NOAA, 235
Submerged Lands Act of 1953:
State boundary controversy, 62, 63Submersibles:
State ownership of seabed and subsoil, 51
Commission recommendation, 180
Construction standards, 215
Depth capabilities, 179, 180
Equipment, 179
Navigation needs, 214
Vehicle design, 178, 179
Taiwan, offshore coal mining, 132
Technical and operating services, program costs, 225
Test Facilities and Ocean Ranges Project, 38, 47
Texas University, assistance to the Commission, 282
Thompson and Co., J. I., Washington, D.C., "A Perspective of Regional and State Marine Environmental Activities: A Questionnaire Survey, Statistics and Observations," 283
Tiros satellite, oceanographic research capabilities, 193
TRANSIT navigation satellites, Navy, 213
Transportation, Department of (DOT):
Commission recommendation: port and waterway study initiation, 66
Marine research funding, 24
start of page 305
Offshore development role, 70Trieste, U.S.S., depth record, 179, 180
Truman Proclamation of 1945, 145
Tsunami Warning System:
Commission recommendation, 189
Coordinating responsibility, 200
Instrumentation needs, 189
U.N. (see United Nations).
U.N. International Maritime Consultative Organization, 75
United Nations (U.N.) (see also Ad hoc Committee To Study the Peaceful Uses of the Sea-Bed and the Ocean Floor Beyond the Limits of National Jurisdiction; Disarmament Committee; Intergovernmental Oceanographic Organization; Office of Oceanography).
Arms limitations, 3, 4University affairs (see also Education).
International fisheries management, 104-106
Marine science organizations in or related to the U.N., chart, 201
Proposed Declaration of Principles for continental shelf registration, 155, 156
Proposed international registry authority, 149
U.S. proposal to encourage cooperation in the scientific investigation of the bed and subsoil of the high seas, 205
Coastal Zone Laboratories, establishment, 9, 10University-National Laboratories:
University-National Laboratories, 5
Commission. recommendations:Unmanned instrumentation system:Establishment, 27Establishment and role, 5, 27
Institutional funding, 242, 243
Funding, 40, 44
International Decade of Ocean Exploration research, 175
Location, 27
Management, 26, 27
Need, 26
Research and exploration program, cost estimates, 205
Commission recommendation, 181U.S.S.R., cooperation with United States in international fisheries management, 104, 107
Cost estimates, 206
Future capabilities, 180, 181
V
Vessel subsidy program:
Estimated savings, 167
Recommended repeal, 98
Water Quality Act of 1965, 75
Water Resources Council, coastal zone interest, 56
Water Resources Planning Act of 1965:
Coastal zones management aid, 57Weather, oceanographic effects, 169
River basin commissions, 56
Consolidation under ESSA, 241WMO (see World Meteorological Organization).
NODC establishment agreement, 219
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution:
Gulf Stream structure research, 173World Meteorological Organization (WMO) (see also World Weather Program).
Status, 25
Capabilities, 200World Weather Program:
ESSA membership, 241
International weather observing program, 188
Meteorology and fisheries studies, 190
Real-time data exchange, 199
U.S. participation, 16, 169
World Weather Program sponsorship, 200
Description, 200
U.S. participation, 16, 244, 245
U.S. support, 3
Zones under international law:
Contiguous zone, 50
Continental shelf, 50, 51
High seas, 50
Internal waters and territorial sea, 49, 50
| Last modified: Mon, 26-Nov-2007 16:39 EST | Library.Webmaster@noaa.gov | ||
|
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
USA.gov - The U.S. Government's Web Portal
|
|||